Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense

ALSO SERVING LEE, CHARLOTTE & ALL SOUTH WEST FLORIDA COUNTIES
Toll-Free
239.217.3723

Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays

Free Consultations
ALSO SERVING LEE, CHARLOTTE & ALL SOUTH WEST FLORIDA COUNTIES
Toll-Free
239.217.3723
Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays
Free Consultations
Call
Email
Map

OUR RECENT VICTORIES

Jan 8, 2015 Case: 14-CM-009517 Judge Jeske
Facts: The defendant was detained by the police after he rear ended another car in a parking lot. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes. The defendant admitted to having a couple of shots of alcohol. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .089 in the breath machine. The defendant was also charged with possession of marijuana and paraphernalia that was found in the car after his arrest for DUI.
Defense: Prior to trial, Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the officer's observations in the reports contradicted the defendant's field sobriety test performance on the video tape. The State then Dropped the DUI. The drug charges were dismissed under the theory of a lack of constructive possession.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jan 8, 2015 Case: 2014-CT-024198AXXX-XX Judge Koons
Facts: The defendant was found by the police after his car went into a ditch. The defendant stated he had a coughing attack which caused him to drive off the road. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and was unsteady on his feet. The officer also observed the defendant to be clumsy, unsure, fumbling around, a pale face, and disarranged clothing. The defendant was read his Miranda rights and stated he wanted an attorney. According to the officer, he refused to perform the roadside tests and was was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's second dui arrest. The entire event at the scene was captured on video tape.
Defense: Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress all the evidence based on a lack of probable cause to make the arrest. In our motion. we alleged numerous factors pointing out inconsistencies between the officer's reports versus the video tape. For example, on video the defendant was never asked to perform roadside test even though it was written in the police report. Also, the defendant's speech was normal, his face was actually red, not pale, and his clothes were not disarranged. The defendant was also never off balance or unsteady and was responsive and coherent. Prior to the motion being heard, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jan 8, 2015 Case: 14-CT-121830 Judge Jeske
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding, cutting across lanes of traffic, and following other cars too close causing them to brake. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred/mumbled speech, and watery eyes. The defendant was unsteady on his feet and was making unusual statements. After performing the HGN (eye test), he refused to perform any other tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton had pretrial negotiations with the State a couple of weeks prior to the trial date.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jan 8, 2015 Case: 14-CM-009517 Judge Jeske
Facts: The defendant was detained by the police after he rear ended another car in a parking lot. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes. The defendant admitted to having a couple of shots of alcohol. According to the officer, he failed the video taped roadside tests. He was then arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .089 in the breath machine. The defendant was also charged with possession of marijuana and paraphernalia that was found in the car after his arrest for DUI.
Defense: Prior to trial, Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the officer's observations in the reports contradicted the defendant's field sobriety test performance on the video tape. The State then Dropped the DUI. The drug charges were dismissed under the theory of a lack of constructive possession.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Jan 8, 2015 Case: 2014-CT-011400-O Judge Miller
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding and weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, a flushed face, and bloodshot eyes. When the defendant was asked how much he had drank, he responded by saying "not much." He then told the officer he had one drink. The defendant refused to perform the field sobriety tests even after being advised of the adverse consequences. He was then arrested for DUI and subsequently refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton had immediate pretrial discussions with the prosecutor within weeks after the defendant's arrest. At the first pretrial court hearing, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 15, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-001346-E Judge Blechman
Facts: The defendant was involved in a single car crash. When the officers arrived, they noticed the defendant to be unsteady, have bloodshot eyes, lethargic movements, and slurred speech. Although the officers did not smell any alcohol, they felt he was impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance. According to the officers, he exhibited several cues of impairment on the field sobriety tests and was then arrested for DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that there was no specific evidence by which the State could prove that the defendant was impaired by a specific chemical and/or controlled substance as required by Florida law.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Dec 15, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-001346-E Judge Blechman
Facts: The defendant was involved in a single car crash. When the officers arrived, they noticed the defendant to be unsteady, have bloodshot eyes, lethargic movements, and slurred speech. Although the officers did not smell any alcohol, they felt he was impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance. According to the officers, he exhibited several cues of impairment on the field sobriety tests and was then arrested for DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that there was no specific evidence by which the State could prove that the defendant was impaired by a specific chemical and/or controlled substance as required by Florida law.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Dec 15, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-001346-E Judge Blechman
Facts: The defendant was involved in a single car crash. When the officers arrived, they noticed the defendant to be unsteady, have bloodshot eyes, lethargic movements, and slurred speech. Although the officers did not smell any alcohol, they felt he was impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance. According to the officers, he exhibited several cues of impairment on the field sobriety tests and was then arrested for DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that there was no specific evidence by which the State could prove that the defendant was impaired by a specific chemical and/or controlled substance as required by Florida law.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Dec 15, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-105718 Judge Greco
Facts: The defendant crashed her car in the airport parking garage. When officers arrived, they noticed the defendant to have slurred speech, uncoordinated movements, and she seemed lethargic. The officers smelled no alcohol on her breath but the defendant admitted to taking Xanax that morning. No roadside tasks were conducted due to the defendant's injuries from the crash. The defendant complained of pain in her back, neck, arms, and knee from the airbags hitting her upon them deploying. She was then taken to the hospital. She agreed to provide a blood sample. When the blood test came back from the lab, the defendant tested positive for Xanax. She was later charged with Driving Under the Influence of a Controlled Substance (ie. Xanax).
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the defendant had not taken the medication for hours as the crash occurred late at night. Also, we pointed out that any impairment the officers observed was due to the injuries from the crash and airbags deploying versus any alleged impairment from the Xanax.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 12, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-009560-O Judge Martinez
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving without headlights. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, unstable balance, and glossy eyes. The defendant's speech was also heavily slurred. He failed the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. The officer found marijuana in the car and he was also charged with possession of marijuana. After his arrest, he blew a .114 and .108 in the breath machine per the breath test card printout.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the officer had written in one paragraph of his report that the defendant was stopped for driving without headlights, however, in the next paragraph he wrote that he arrived on scene to find fire rescue giving sternum rubs to the defendant as he was passed out at an intersection. The officer also wrote in his report that the defendant blew a .186 and .176 in the breath machine which was different than the breath card. It was totally unclear to both the State and defense whether the officer was writing about this client or another defendant. Due to the major contradictions in the police reports and breath test results, the State Dropped the DUI and the defendant received no conviction on the possession charge.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 12, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-009560-O Judge Martinez
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving without headlights. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, unstable balance, and glossy eyes. The defendant's speech was also heavily slurred. He failed the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. The officer found marijuana in the car and he was also charged with possession of marijuana. After his arrest, he blew a .114 and .108 in the breath machine per the breath test card printout.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the officer had written in one paragraph of his report that the defendant was stopped for driving without headlights, however, in the next paragraph he wrote that he arrived on scene to find fire rescue giving sternum rubs to the defendant as he was passed out at an intersection. The officer also wrote in his report that the defendant blew a .186 and .176 in the breath machine which was different than the breath card. It was totally unclear to both the State and defense whether the officer was writing about this client or another defendant. Due to the major contradictions in the police reports and breath test results, the State Dropped the DUI and the defendant received no conviction on the possession charge.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 9, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-001298CTAXMX Judge Cupp
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding and driving on the wrong side of the road. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a flushed face. Once the defendant was outside the car, she was very unsteady and off balance. She failed the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. The defendant admitted to consuming four beers. Once at the station, she vomited in a trash can after taking the breath test. She blew a .188 and .178 in the breath machine.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the breath machine that the defendant blew into had major mechanical problems during the months leading up to her arrest. Also, the officer wrote a very vague report as to the details of her alleged performance on the roadside tasks.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 9, 2014 Case: 14-CT-066124 Judge Conrad
Facts: The defendant was stopped by police after pulling out of a parking lot at a high rate of speed, screeching his tires, and cutting off another car. This all was captured on the officer's in car video tape. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. On video, the defendant was rambling on and on about different things and then admitted to drinking two beers. The defendant then refused to perform the field sobriety tests even after being warned of the adverse consequences. He was subsequently arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton had pre-trial discussions with the State about dropping the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 9, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-001298CTAXMX Judge Cupp
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding and driving on the wrong side of the road. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and a flushed face. Once the defendant was outside the car, she was very unsteady and off balance. She failed the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. The defendant admitted to consuming four beers. Once at the station, she vomited in a trash can after taking the breath test. She blew a .188 and .178 in the breath machine.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the breath machine that the defendant blew into had major mechanical problems during the months leading up to her arrest. Also, the officer wrote a very vague report as to the details of her alleged performance on the roadside tasks.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 9, 2014 Case: 14-CT-066124 Judge Conrad
Facts: The defendant was stopped by police after pulling out of a parking lot at a high rate of speed, screeching his tires, and cutting off another car. This all was captured on the officer's in car video tape. The officer observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and glassy eyes. On video, the defendant was rambling on and on about different things and then admitted to drinking two beers. The defendant then refused to perform the field sobriety tests even after being warned of the adverse consequences. He was subsequently arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton had pre-trial discussions with the State about dropping the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 5, 2014 Case: 7819-GWZ Judge Ortiz
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed the defendant to have bloodshot eyes and dilated pupils. The officer also smelled marijuana coming from her breath. She was then asked to perform field sobriety tests which she allegedly failed. She was then arrested for DUI. A Drug Recognition Officer was called to the station to perform a special evaluation called a DRE exam to try to come to a conclusion as to what controlled substance may be impairing the defendant. That officer with special training concluded she was impaired by marijuana and CNS depressants. A urine sample was then taken from the defendant. After being tested at the lab, the defendant's urine came back positive for marijuana.
Defense: Parks & Braxton conducted pre-trial negotiations with the prosecutor regarding the amount of time marijuana can stay in one's system even weeks after they last smoked. The reason that was important is that the defendant did not admit to smoking pot that day.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 5, 2014 Case: 7819-GWZ Judge Ortiz
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed the defendant to have bloodshot eyes and dilated pupils. The officer also smelled marijuana coming from her breath. She was then asked to perform field sobriety tests which she allegedly failed. She was then arrested for DUI. A Drug Recognition Officer was called to the station to perform a special evaluation called a DRE exam to try to come to a conclusion as to what controlled substance may be impairing the defendant. That officer with special training concluded she was impaired by marijuana and CNS depressants. A urine sample was then taken from the defendant. After being tested at the lab, the defendant's urine came back positive for marijuana.
Defense: Parks & Braxton conducted pre-trial negotiations with the prosecutor regarding the amount of time marijuana can stay in one's system even weeks after they last smoked. The reason that was important is that the defendant did not admit to smoking pot that day.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 4, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-022175AXXX Judge Shepherd
Facts: The defendant was stopped based on an anonymous tip that he was driving all over the road and almost striking other cars. The officers spotted the defendant's car which matched the description and conducted a traffic stop. The officers on scene noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, mumbled speech, and glassy eyes. The defendant seemed confused, was swaying, and admitted to drinking. According to the officers, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the traffic stop may have been unlawful as there appeared to be no "corroboration" of the alleged driving pattern as required by law when a driver is stopped based on an anonymous tip.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 4, 2014 Case: 2014-CT-022175AXXX Judge Shepherd
Facts: The defendant was stopped based on an anonymous tip that he was driving all over the road and almost striking other cars. The officers spotted the defendant's car which matched the description and conducted a traffic stop. The officers on scene noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, mumbled speech, and glassy eyes. The defendant seemed confused, was swaying, and admitted to drinking. According to the officers, he failed the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that the traffic stop may have been unlawful as there appeared to be no "corroboration" of the alleged driving pattern as required by law when a driver is stopped based on an anonymous tip.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Dec 1, 2014 Case: 14-CT-080009 Judge Lefler
Facts: The defendant was stopped for making an illegal left turn. The officer noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He admitting to drinking Heineken beers. According to the officer, he failed the video taped field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .127 and .133 in the breath machine.
Defense: Parks & Braxton had pre-trial negotiations with the State. We pointed out to the State that the defendant's roadside task performance on the video tape contradicted the breath test results.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.

OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP

To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 239.217.3723, or fill out the form here.