Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense

ALSO SERVING LEE, CHARLOTTE & ALL SOUTH WEST FLORIDA COUNTIES
Toll-Free
239.217.3723

Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays

Free Consultations
ALSO SERVING LEE, CHARLOTTE & ALL SOUTH WEST FLORIDA COUNTIES
Toll-Free
239.217.3723
Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays
Free Consultations
Call
Email
Map

OUR RECENT VICTORIES

Mar 28, 2012 Case: 11-005676MM10A Judge Cowart
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving on the wrong side of the road on a highway. The defendant was going southbound in the northbound lanes. The officer observed a strong odor of alcohol, watery eyes as well as slurred speech. The defendant stated that she knew she was wrong and was coming home from a restaurant. She then stated that she had two captain and cokes. The defendant was allegedly off balance as she exited the car. The defendant was asked to perform field sobriety tests. After performing the walk and turn, one leg stand and HGN (eye test), she was arrested for DUI. She subsequently refused to provide a breath test. This was the defendant's 3rd DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on coercion to perform the field sobriety tests. Specifically, the defense alleged that the Trooper made an improper statement while requesting the defendant to perform field sobriety tests.
Result: The State conceded the motion to suppress and dropped the DUI.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: CT-253597-X Judge Dominguez
Facts: The defendant was detained by the police at the airport exit for failing to pay for parking. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, inconsistent responses upon questioning by the police, bloodshot eyes, and unsteadiness upon exiting the vehicle. The defendant refused the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. The officers considered her to be impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance versus alcohol due to her actions.
Defense: Parks & Braxton prepared the case for trial. The State could not prove which specific chemical and/or controlled substance impaired the defendant as required by Florida Law.
Result: The DUI was Dismissed.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: 2012-CT-004929AXXX Judge Castor
Facts: The defendant was seen by a police officer standing outside his car talking on a cell phone stumbling around. Both tires were flat on the car and the officer wanted to see if the defendant was okay. He then observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and slurred speech. He was requested to perform field sobriety tests and after refusing to do them and being very argumentative, he was arrested for DUI. The defendant was also almost falling over while talking to the officer.
Result: The DUI was Dismissed.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: 11-005676MM10A Judge Cowart
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving on the wrong side of the road on a highway. The defendant was going southbound in the northbound lanes. The officer observed a strong odor of alcohol, watery eyes as well as slurred speech. The defendant stated that she knew she was wrong and was coming home from a restaurant. She then stated that she had two captain and cokes. The defendant was allegedly off balance as she exited the car. The defendant was asked to perform field sobriety tests. After performing the walk and turn, one leg stand and HGN (eye test), she was arrested for DUI. She subsequently refused to provide a breath test. This was the defendant's 3rd DUI.
Result: The State conceded the motion to suppress and dropped the DUI.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: CT-253597-X Judge Dominguez
Facts: The defendant was detained by the police at the airport exit for failing to pay for parking. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, inconsistent responses upon questioning by the police, bloodshot eyes, and unsteadiness upon exiting the vehicle. The defendant refused the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. The officers considered her to be impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance versus alcohol due to her actions.
Result: The DUI was Dismissed.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: 2012-CT-004929AXXX Judge Castor
Facts: The defendant was seen by a police officer standing outside his car talking on a cell phone stumbling around. Both tires were flat on the car and the officer wanted to see if the defendant was okay. He then observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and slurred speech. He was requested to perform field sobriety tests and after refusing to do them and being very argumentative, he was arrested for DUI. The defendant was also almost falling over while talking to the officer.
Result: The DUI was Dismissed.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: 11-005676MM10A Judge Cowart
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving on the wrong side of the road on a highway. The defendant was going southbound in the northbound lanes. The officer observed a strong odor of alcohol, watery eyes as well as slurred speech. The defendant stated that she knew she was wrong and was coming home from a restaurant. She then stated that she had two captain and cokes. The defendant was allegedly off balance as she exited the car. The defendant was asked to perform field sobriety tests. After performing the walk and turn, one leg stand and HGN (eye test), she was arrested for DUI. She subsequently refused to provide a breath test. This was the defendant's 3rd DUI.
Result: The State conceded the motion to suppress and dropped the DUI.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: CT-253597-X Judge Dominguez
Facts: The defendant was detained by the police at the airport exit for failing to pay for parking. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, inconsistent responses upon questioning by the police, bloodshot eyes, and unsteadiness upon exiting the vehicle. The defendant refused the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. The officers considered her to be impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance versus alcohol due to her actions.
Result: The DUI was Dismissed.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: 2012-CT-004929AXXX Judge Castor
Facts: The defendant was seen by a police officer standing outside his car talking on a cell phone stumbling around. Both tires were flat on the car and the officer wanted to see if the defendant was okay. He then observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and slurred speech. He was requested to perform field sobriety tests and after refusing to do them and being very argumentative, he was arrested for DUI. The defendant was also almost falling over while talking to the officer.
Defense: Prior to court, Parks & Braxton spoke to the prosecutors and pointed out that there was no witness who placed the defendant in actual physical control of the motor vehicle. Thus, pursuant to Florida Statute 901.15, the arrest for DUI was unlawful.
Result: The DUI was Dismissed.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: 11-005676MM10A Judge Cowart
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving on the wrong side of the road on a highway. The defendant was going southbound in the northbound lanes. The officer observed a strong odor of alcohol, watery eyes as well as slurred speech. The defendant stated that she knew she was wrong and was coming home from a restaurant. She then stated that she had two captain and cokes. The defendant was allegedly off balance as she exited the car. The defendant was asked to perform field sobriety tests. After performing the walk and turn, one leg stand and HGN (eye test), she was arrested for DUI. She subsequently refused to provide a breath test. This was the defendant's 3rd DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on coercion to perform the field sobriety tests. Specifically, the defense alleged that the Trooper made an improper statement while requesting the defendant to perform field sobriety tests.
Result: The State conceded the motion to suppress and dropped the DUI.
Mar 28, 2012 Case: CT-253597-X Judge Dominguez
Facts: The defendant was detained by the police at the airport exit for failing to pay for parking. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, inconsistent responses upon questioning by the police, bloodshot eyes, and unsteadiness upon exiting the vehicle. The defendant refused the roadside tasks and was arrested for DUI. The officers considered her to be impaired by a chemical and/or controlled substance versus alcohol due to her actions.
Defense: Parks & Braxton prepared the case for trial. The State could not prove which specific chemical and/or controlled substance impaired the defendant as required by Florida Law.
Result: The DUI was Dismissed.
Mar 22, 2012 Case: CT-006903-XEY Judge Myers
Facts: The defendant was stopped by police after allegedly being involved in a hit and run traffic crash. The officers noticed damage to the defendant's car. He had an odor of alcohol upon his breath, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and he walked in a "zig zag" pattern once out of the car. They also saw the defendant stumble. There was no video tape of the DUI investigation at the scene. The defendant refused the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Mar 22, 2012 Case: 2011-CT-7167-A-O Judge Shoemaker
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He performed the roadside tasks at the request of the officer and they were video taped. According to the officer, he performed poorly and was arrested for DUI.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Mar 22, 2012 Case: CT-006903-XEY Judge Myers
Facts: The defendant was stopped by police after allegedly being involved in a hit and run traffic crash. The officers noticed damage to the defendant's car. He had an odor of alcohol upon his breath, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and he walked in a "zig zag" pattern once out of the car. They also saw the defendant stumble. There was no video tape of the DUI investigation at the scene. The defendant refused the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton prepared the case for trial.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Mar 22, 2012 Case: 2011-CT-7167-A-O Judge Shoemaker
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He performed the roadside tasks at the request of the officer and they were video taped. According to the officer, he performed poorly and was arrested for DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that on the video tape none of the defendant's "normal faculties" were impaired.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Mar 22, 2012 Case: CT-006903-XEY Judge Myers
Facts: The defendant was stopped by police after allegedly being involved in a hit and run traffic crash. The officers noticed damage to the defendant's car. He had an odor of alcohol upon his breath, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and he walked in a "zig zag" pattern once out of the car. They also saw the defendant stumble. There was no video tape of the DUI investigation at the scene. The defendant refused the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Mar 22, 2012 Case: 2011-CT-7167-A-O Judge Shoemaker
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He performed the roadside tasks at the request of the officer and they were video taped. According to the officer, he performed poorly and was arrested for DUI.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Mar 22, 2012 Case: CT-006903-XEY Judge Myers
Facts: The defendant was stopped by police after allegedly being involved in a hit and run traffic crash. The officers noticed damage to the defendant's car. He had an odor of alcohol upon his breath, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and he walked in a "zig zag" pattern once out of the car. They also saw the defendant stumble. There was no video tape of the DUI investigation at the scene. The defendant refused the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. This was the defendant's Second DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton prepared the case for trial.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Mar 22, 2012 Case: 2011-CT-7167-A-O Judge Shoemaker
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He performed the roadside tasks at the request of the officer and they were video taped. According to the officer, he performed poorly and was arrested for DUI.
Defense: Parks & Braxton pointed out to the State that on the video tape none of the defendant's "normal faculties" were impaired.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.
Mar 21, 2012 Case: 11-CT-504601 Judge Hayes
Facts: The defendant was stopped for having illegal tint on his car windows. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and red/watery eyes. The defendant also admitted to drinking beer. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests which were video taped. He was then arrested for DUI and refused the breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton prepared the case for trial.
Result: The State Dropped the DUI.

OBTAIN IMMEDIATE LEGAL HELP

To save your license, you must act within 10 days. Get in touch with our firm by calling 239.217.3723, or fill out the form here.